The economic impact
| |
|
 |
| |
95 per cent of 55-65-year-old men were working in 1975.
In 1999 the figure was closer to 60 per cent.
By 2010 only 17 per cent of the workforce will be aged
18-24, while almost 40 per cent will be over 45.
(Labour Market Survey 1999)
The availability of permanent staff has deteriorated at
the fastest rate for nearly three years.
(REC 2000)
|
|
 |
|
|
The impact of an ageing population is graphically described in
two EFA publications: 'The Macroeconomic Costs of Ageism'
(1998) and 'Ageism: too costly to ignore' (2001).
According to the latter, contraction of the UK workforce due to
ageing, falling birthrate and other factors, such as 'disguised
unemployment' *, will have serious consequences, which could include
lower GDP (gross domestic product) and a declining standard of living.
By 2025, for every two people employed there is likely to be one
person older than 50 who is either retired or inactive.
Writing in Ageism: too costly to ignore, Sean Rickard says: 'If
we do not succeed as a society in reducing the numbers of people
over the age of 50 who are not actively engaged in the economy,
then we are likely to suffer a cumulative annual loss of GDP, and
an associated fall in living standards, that is increasing in value
each year
the economy has at its disposal an enormous untapped
resource of human capital in those aged 50 and above.'
The urgency of the problem is recognised by the Commission on Global
Ageing: 'The challenges of global ageing are fundamental, unprecedented
and potentially destabilising
The major social crises of the
21st century will be the by-product of labour shortages.' **
And the UK Government acknowledged the issue in a recent major
report. 'Winning the Generation Game' *** set out the agenda for
addressing age, employment and inactivity issues, and set specific
deadlines for achieving measurable results within Government.
Back to top
How will businesses be affected?
As the workforce ages and contracts, skilled workers will increasingly
come at a premium. Businesses that fail to respond, by broadening
their search for talent to include a range of age groups, will put
their future growth and profitability at risk, while missing out
on the benefits that age diversity can bring.
Although slowdowns in the economy will release skilled people into
the jobs market, the effect will be temporary. When the economy
recovers, demand will become even more intense as employers scramble
to regain lost ground.
This view was given credence by International Data Corporation
research published in September 2001. Although the IT sector was
then experiencing a slump, IDC predicted that the sector would face
an acute skills shortage as the industry recovered rapidly during
2002.****
The underlying message is that economic slowdowns are short-lived,
while population decline is long-term.
* Those economically inactive people who,
although not seeking work, might better be described as unemployed.
** Quoted in The Guardian 30 August 2001
*** PIU, April 2000
**** IDC report, September 2001
Back to top
|